Friday, July 30, 2010

What do you think of the interracial couple being denied a marriage license?

The judge claims that he is thinking of possible children that the couple may have. He says, though, that he has tons of black friends and treats them as equal. What say you?What do you think of the interracial couple being denied a marriage license?
Unfortunately, the Justice may be half right. I've worked with divorced and single fathers for 20 years, and I can say the a marriage between an African/American male and a Caucasian female have a high rate of failure, resulting in the mothers trying to alienate the children from the father. There's a much lower rate with them marrying a Asian woman. For Caucasian males marry an African/American woman, the failure rate of the marriage is much lower than marrying a Caucasian woman. I hate using the term race as we are all a part of the human race.





Now for this couple, if they were both virgins, their chances of a long marriage would be much greater due to their ages. Both were fully mature. Over 85% of divorces involve couples who cohabit or marry prior to age 24. The best age for a male to first develop a relationship, and get married, is when he passes age 30.


\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\What do you think of the interracial couple being denied a marriage license?
I thought I'd hit a time warp, was back before the 1960's. I don't even know if licenses can be denied for other reasons, too, other than somebody being underage and in most states, same sex marriage.





To somebody who asked, I think it was in Louisiana.





My question is, do two whites, blacks, or anybody come in, and the authorities say ';You look like you'll abuse your kids, I can't give you a license.'; Or ';You are both scientists. Your kids will be Nerds. We can't do that to the kids.';





I mean where does this stop.
1) His actions are illegal since as a JOP he is an officer of the government as his actions invade privacy and are discriminitory





2) His actions are immoral and as such he should be stoned until he is unconscious then when he wakes up punched in the face





3) He himself is a complete idiot who should be fired since no marriage law on eligibility or oath mentions children so he abused the power of his office in an area he has no legal authority on...by that I mean his office has nothing to do with children and/or reproduction and so he needs to just be quiet on that issue in his official capacity








Stupid crap like this all comes from our opening the bottle on rights by the anti-gay marriage crowd.


They have made a wedge issue creating a legal grey area where some people think it is ok for their own personal codes of ethics to trump law, decency and adults' rights to choose for themselves.








C Y %26gt; if he was a priest or clergy member whose church refused that woudl be fine......but since you are not aware in this modern era we have anti-discrimination laws, equality laws, and SCOTUS determined decades ago a BASIC CIVIL RIGHT TO MARRIAGE and so a govt official does NOT in any way imaginable have the right and/or authority to exercise their own personal will in who can obtain basic civil rights and who cannot.


Also heads up the Roman empire is gone, fire was discovered, and the wheel was a big hit....just an fyi since I have to explain basics here








EL VACHITO ***** %26gt; saying he won't sign but someone else can is like a school teacher saying ';Oh a black kid can get an education..just not from me';...and it is not valid. By basic American law if you are a governmental official then your must abide by governmental rules+codes of conduct and you rpersonal opinions *must* remain seperate...it is the very same thing that allows a govt official to be say a devote muslim...they can have their freedom of religion but by law it must remain seperate and outside of any situation that involves their activities **as a representative of the US govt**
The silver lining to this cloud is that we still live in a country where we can stand up for our beliefs, and not be forced to write a marriage certificate against our will in the name of political correctness. Was it wrong-yeah it was. So what. Get over it, and find someone whose not a dinosaur to marry you so you can live happily ever after. Furthermore, why would you even want a guy who doesn't agree with your beliefs to marry you in the first place.
I wonder if if would have made a difference to him if the man was white and the woman was black. Or if it were a Asian and Hispanic couple.





It's been a long time since we have heard this variation of ';Separate but equal'; argument. He needs to check his US Supreme Court precedent.





Then again, being the devil's advocate, his point was that he (personally) is just not signing the license. He did not say that the couple can't get signature from somebody else.
F**ing racist *** Louisiana. That is total BS. The judge shouldn't have the authority to approve or disprove marriages. Man, that's like me saying I won't let the judge get married, because I want to protect his future wife from the nauseating and traumatizing experience of having sex with his ugly ***.
White Southern Liberal Democrat....Butt Weight, those are the same people who began a group called ';Night Riders'; and who began the little social club called ';The KKK';....


SO by looking at the history of the groups involved and the people who presently belong to those groups it can be safely said that the DNC is behind this decision....and the President couldn't be happier....





I see at least 3 people who don't know their US History...The SOUTHERN White Liberal Democrats attempted to keep the People of Color from getting voting rights in the 1860-90's...Now they are THE party of Color....Can't disagree with History...Just because you don't like the outcome...
NOTE: Sarcasm forth coming:





Obviously the judge is right! (NOT!) I mean look at what those of a multi-ethnic background turn into...





Derek Jeter,


Mariah Carey,


Tiger Woods,





and the list goes on and on into infinity.





I guess the judge really knows his (um) stuff?
well his actions that he enacted may have illegal but certainly just because one is against interracial marriages doesn't mean they are racists as I am one who is against the same preposition but I have many friends from different ethnicities (white,black,brown,yellow,red,etc).
shows how much history


is still with us which many


want us to deny
I happen to agree with the judge. Its unfair to the children who would have to live with being called half casts. Have anyone seen a blackbird mate with a dove.? At least animals and birds know whats right and whats wrong
Ridiculous...





I would ask the judge, whom I believe is disingenuous about his reasons, how racial progress can be made with this type of policy.
Its the 21st century and his views are still stuck in the 60s. All racists justify thier racist thinking with the line I have plenty of black friends.
He has no right to decide whether or not skin color affects these people's ability to be good parents and should not be a judge.
Unbelievable.
I think it was wrong. Color should be no boundary for love and marriage.
What kind of a judge would still have a job after that? Were did this take place ?
I say GOOD! It's about time they put a stop to that kind of disgusting behavior!
Okay, I think that's just wrong.
I think it's stupid. You love who you love, color doesn't matter.
where is this occurring?
I happen to agree with the judge pertaining to this matter. There's absolutely nothing wrong with socializing with another race(in fact, none at all) however natural balances are being interfered with through copulation between two people of separate races. Also makes those that preach natural law over rule of law hypocrites through their own actions.
  • cosmetics
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment